We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Hermes EOS to provide qualified support for the Chair of Deutsche Börse

Home / Press Centre / Hermes EOS to provide qualified support for the Chair of Deutsche Börse

Dr Michael Viehs, Manager – Engagement and Research
15 May 2018

Ahead of the Deutsche Börse AGM on Wednesday 16 May, Dr Michael Viehs, Associate Director of Responsibility, comments on Hermes EOS’s voting recommendations and the qualified support for the re-election of Joachim Faber, the Chair of the supervisory board.

Specifically, Hermes EOS recommends its clients and other investors to:

  • Vote against the discharge of the company’s former CEO Carsten Kengeter and the Chair of the supervisory board, Joachim Faber
  • Provide qualified support for the re-election of Joachim Faber, the Chair of the supervisory board, and call for clarity around his succession by the time of the AGM in 2019
  • Vote for the supervisory board nominees

Votes against the discharge of CEO and Chair
We recommend our clients to vote against the discharge of the former CEO Carsten Kengeter[1]. In light of the external investigation into his alleged insider trading relating to an ill-designed remuneration system, Mr Kengeter stepped down as the CEO in the second half of 2017. We question Mr Kengeter’s role in the proposed merger with the London Stock Exchange (LSE). In interviews following the failed merger deal, he openly admitted that the preparation for the proposed merger has not been “ideal” and that the company communicated poorly with its key stakeholders about the benefits of the merger.[2] In our view, this raises concerns about the proper execution and planning of the proposed deal by the executive management team.

We also recommend to vote against the discharge of the Chair of the supervisory board, Joachim Faber. He played an active role in the proposed merger negotiations with the LSE. As Chair, together with Mr Kengeter, he is thus ultimately responsible for apparent mistakes in the communication with key stakeholders and in the preparation and execution of the proposed merger with the LSE. We also believe that the company’s questionable executive remuneration system, designed by the supervisory board under the leadership of Mr Faber, played a key part in the alleged insider dealing of the former CEO, as it required him to make significant investments into the company’s shares at a specific point in time – allegedly when the negotiations with the LSE were already ongoing. Finally, the Chair bears ultimate responsibility for the way the ongoing investigation was handled and given the circumstances, allowed Mr Kengeter to remain in position for too long.

Qualified support for re-election of Joachim Faber
Despite our recommendation to vote against the discharge of Mr Faber, we support his re-election for a three-year term as part of an orderly transition of the supervisory board Chair. Given the aforementioned concerns, we have some reservations about his re-election but the current transition phase of the company with a new CEO and no candidate for Chair succession requires the company to have some continuity in the leadership of the supervisory board.

At the same time, we request Mr Faber to not serve for the full three-year term. We expect him to provide clarity on his succession by the time of the AGM in 2019. This should also involve a dialogue with investors and a discussion about the suitability of incumbent supervisory board members for the Chair’s role. The company needs to move on from the failed LSE merger and the insider dealing allegations and this requires further renewal in the supervisory board and a new Chair. 

Supervisory board elections
Hermes EOS will support the election of the three new nominees to the supervisory board, Martin Jetter, Barbara Lambert and Joachim Nagel, as they will strengthen the supervisory board’s breadth of experience and expertise in financial services and technology. We also recommend to vote for the re-election of the incumbent supervisory board members Ann-Kristin Achleitner, Richard Berliand, Karl-Heinz Flöther, and Amy Yip.

[1] The annual formal vote of discharge for the management and supervisory boards gives shareholders the opportunity to approve or disapprove the boards’ actions taken in the last fiscal year. It is effectively a vote of confidence but has no legal consequences.

[2] Handelsblatt (19 April 2017): “Deutsche Börse-Chef Kengeter gibt Fehler zu”, and Handelsblatt (7 September 2017): “Es war meine moralische Pflicht, dieses Angebot anzunehmen”.

Share this post:
Dr Michael Viehs Manager – Engagement and Research Dr Michael Viehs is responsible for intelligent proxy voting in Germany, corporate engagements on environmental, social, and governance issues and for conducting research on sustainability and responsible investing with a focus on consumer goods and retail, mining, oil and gas, pharmaceuticals and utilities. Before his appointment at Hermes EOS, Michael was research director at the Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment at the University of Oxford and visiting assistant professor at the School of Business and Economics at Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Michael is a visiting research associate at the University of Oxford and a research affiliate with the European Centre for Corporate Engagement. He presented his research at several top academic and industry conferences in Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Spain, the UK, the US and South Africa. Michael holds a BSc in International Business Economics, an MSc in International Business and a PhD in Finance from Maastricht University.
Read all articles by Dr Michael Viehs

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Amy Wilson
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Kimberley Lewis
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Maxime Le Floch, CFA
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Peter Hofbauer
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • eos

Press contacts