CLOSE

We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website https://www.hermes-investment.com, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept
CLOSE

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.

Proceed

The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Looser fiscal reins blamed on productivity and Brexit

Home / Press Centre / Looser fiscal reins blamed on productivity and Brexit

Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist
22 November 2017
Macro Economics

Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist at Hermes Investment Management, sets out his reaction to today’s autumn Budget:

With splits in the Party, Brexit looming, and disappointing UK productivity growth, two things from today’s Budget were inevitable: that it was going to be more political than economic; and that lower growth assumptions would involve higher borrowing ratios further out. With Brexit yet to be financed, Mr Hammond was today never going to show other EU governments watching unbridled fiscal largesse.

Through lower growth assumptions (a cumulative 2.2 percentage points), he has effectively had to loosen the fiscal reins again relative to plan, and, depending on how Brexit plays out, may have to kick further down the road the goal he set out last spring to return the deficit to surplus “...sometime in the next Parliament” scheduled for 2022/23. His predecessor, Mr Osborne, had wanted that surplus for three years earlier.

By remaining vague, ‘when’ in the next Parliament remains an open target. From a macro perspective at least, markets may be reassured he may be keeping some fiscal powder dry as a buffer should Brexit darken the finances.

There were admittedly some ‘rabbits out of hats’ for the lower-income end and housing supply, including stamp duty, measures to help cities, and indexation of business rates. However, these together are not enough in the OBR’s forecast to lift GDP growth much beyond ‘potential’ (about 1½%yoy).

So, let’s not get carried away. Depending on Brexit and future growth, the fiscal screw may yet have to be re-tightened later if he is to hit the OBR’s fiscal targets.

First, the deficit. Even including special items like bank sales, QE proceeds, and low interest-rate assumptions, the UK’s 2.4%-of-GDP headline deficit for 2017/18 lies around the middle of the G7 range.

Second, the recovery should have squeezed the debt more than it has. Only in 2017/18 is the net-debt-to-GDP ratio expected to peak – disappointing given real GDP is about 10% up on its pre-crisis peak. This ratio, at 87%, is more than twice Japan’s was, when Japan limped into a ‘lost decade’ in the mid 1990s.

Financing this debt may become more troublesome if we struggle with Brexit, given about one third of gilts outstanding is backed by international investors who will care about currency and ratings risk. This would disrupt the OBR’s low gilt-yield assumptions.

In which case, the risk is the BoE keeps QE running, by reinvesting its maturing bonds, for too long - with the unintended consequences of further asset price distortions, suppressed saving, and increased funding strains on many pension schemes.

Share this post:
Neil Williams Group Chief Economist Neil joined Hermes in August 2009 and is responsible for Hermes’ economic research. He has a forward-looking approach to generate investment strategy ideas. Neil adopts top-down methods – macro and market analysis to identify interest rate and credit value, and sovereign default risk. Neil began his career in 1987 at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), becoming its youngest ever Head of Economic Policy. He went on to hold a number of senior positions in investment banks - including Director of Bond Research at UBS, Head of Research at Sumitomo International, Global Head of Emerging Markets Research at PaineWebber International, and, before coming to Hermes, Head of Sovereign Research and Strategy at Mizuho International. Neil has 30 years’ industry experience and earned an MA in Economics in 1986 from Manchester University, having the previous year completed his BSc (Hons), also in Economics, from University College Swansea.
Read all articles by Neil Williams

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Parry
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Eoin Murray
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • macro economics

Press contacts