CLOSE

We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website https://www.hermes-investment.com, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept
CLOSE

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.

Proceed

The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

US stocks are not expensive – here’s why

Home / Press Centre / US stocks are not expensive – here’s why

Michael Russell, CFA, Portfolio Manager, US All Cap
04 January 2018
US Equities

The dizzying ascent of US stocks dominated news flow last year. The four main US stock barometers have touched a series of record highs, and concerns among investors about ostensibly lofty valuations have prompted many to offload US equities. In doing so, they have risked a significant opportunity cost – Michael Russell, Portfolio Manager, US All Cap, at Hermes Investment Management explains why.

The S&P Equal Weight Index (EWI) - the equal-weighted version of the widely-used S&P 500 index – has ranked among the top performing equity indices, in terms of returns, over the past 17 years. Returns generated by the index during that period were more than double those produced by European or Asian equity markets. And since hitting a nadir during the global financial crisis, the S&P EWI has surged by 368%[1].

Figure 1: S&P Equal Weight Index bounce back

Source: Bloomberg as at November 2017[2]

However, investors are shunning US equities in favour of their international counterparts. In fact, capital has consistently flowed out of US equities and into international stock markets over the last 20 years. Data from the ICI showed that annual net outflows from domestic equity funds totalled almost $250bn in 2016. Investors shifting out of US equities are seeking diversification and better risk-adjusted returns. Furthermore, many believe they are too expensive. But we disagree, here’s why:

  1. The US economy is the largest and most dynamic economy in the world. It offers a supportive environment for entrepreneurs, particularly in places such as Silicon Valley, a world leader in innovation and a technological hub. Furthermore, the much-vaunted idea of the ‘American Dream’ has created a risk-taking mind-set and an entrepreneurial culture. As many as 700,000 new companies are created every year. These new businesses can generate up to 4m new jobs, helping job creation rates recover to pre-recession levels. However, there are also a number of company closures, which lead to job losses.

The revival of entrepreneurship is reflected in the high return on equity (ROE) of the US stock market, which is around 14% compared to 10% in Europe and Asia. The US economy is robust too. Europe’s ROE has been little changed over the last 10 years, while the US has seen its ROE rebound from the global financial crisis in just two years.

  1. Historically, the cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings (CAPE) metric – a valuation measure usually applied to broad equity indices - has produced inconsistent results.

Many bearish market commentators believe this metric suggests that the market is grossly overvalued at its current P/E ratio of about 30x. However, investors using this metric as a sell signal in the past would have missed out on the last three US bull markets. Only two bear markets have ever occurred at the same time as a peak in the CAPE, in the late ‘60s and the 2000s.

Furthermore, the CAPE metric fails to factor in the benign credit backdrop and the changing nature of the US market. Today, US-listed companies are more profitable and the technology sector accounts for the largest weighting in the market since the end of the dotcom era.  Stock prices can rise faster than the CAPE as the recession years roll off the 10 year back period as well.

Figure 2: The CAPE ratio has produced inconsistent results in the past

Source: Robert Shiller, Yale University as at November 2017

  1. The correlation between price-earnings (P/E) and the subsequent 12-month performance of US equities is low. This is not surprising. In general, the equity market does not falter because prices become too high. Rather, the P/E is more likely to peak due to a decline in earnings as the economy falls into recession. For example, the last time CAPE was above 30x earnings was in 1997 – notably, the market doubled between 1997 and 2000.

 

[1] Source: Bloomberg as at November 2017

[2] Note: a log scale is used to depict the large percentage movement of the S&P EWI over an 18-year period

Share this post:
Michael Russell, CFA Portfolio Manager, US All Cap Michael joined Hermes in March 2014 as the co-manager of the US SMID Cap strategy and became lead manager of the US All Cap strategy in May 2015. Michael was most recently senior portfolio manager of the Global Developed Markets Equity funds at Nomura Asset Management, where he worked for eight years. During this time he also acted as portfolio manager of the firm’s US equity funds for five years from 2005. Earlier in his career Michael held senior roles managing US equity funds at Merrill Lynch Investment Managers and Mercury Asset Management. He is a CFA charterholder and has an MA in Economics from Cambridge University. CFA® is a trademark owned by the CFA Institute.
Read all articles by Michael Russell, CFA

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Parry
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Ilana Elbim
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Joseph Buckley
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso
  • Yasmin Chowdhury

Find posts by category

  • us equities

Press contacts