CLOSE

We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website https://www.hermes-investment.com, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2016, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept
CLOSE

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

Proceed

The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Home / Hermes EOS Blog / Time to include mental health in a company’s health and safety assessment

23 April 2015
Social

Mental-health-blog-pic-post-Overture

Is there room for happiness, well-being and fulfilment in the workplace? Most people would believe so. And surely if you have greater job satisfaction, you are happier, which increases  productivity and potentially leads to career progression. However, in the difficult economic environment of the past years, a knock-on effect of the recession has been the reduction in workforce and increasing pressures on staff to keep output high. Inevitably, this pressure has created stressful working environments across businesses and even in boardrooms. In 2011, we saw almost £1 billion being wiped off the market value of Lloyds Banking Group after its CEO went on sick leave having been diagnosed with extreme fatigue and stress due to overwork, according to media reports.

Long-term absence

Mental health conditions have emerged as the most single widespread cause of long-term absence from the workforce, according to the 2013 CBI/Pfizer Absence and Workplace Health Survey. But the report also found that the average absence rate was 5.3 days in 2012, down from 6.5 days in 2010, with the reduction saving UK businesses £3 billion. Perhaps this is an indication that employers are getting better at tackling the root causes of the problem. However, how many employees would be willing to tell their boss about how their stress, anxiety and depression struggles, for fear of discrimination or even dismissal? This leads to questions on whether accurate data is recorded on such conditions by employers in the first place and whether companies are taking positive steps to manage mental health issues related to work and non-work related stress, anxiety and depression.

Consequences

Little appears to have been done to beat the stigma attached to depression. For instance, after the co-pilot of the Germanwings crashed the plane into the French Alps there was a perception that there could be a link between depression and violence. Sometimes it may also be suggested that burned out employees facing pressures and bullying at work should simply become better at managing their workload and improve how they cope with anxiety and stress. Mental health problems have an implication for business which is why workload pressures, shift work, difficult relationships at work and additional responsibilities should be actively addressed by employers.

Company response

For years, businesses have tried to mitigate health and safety risks by focusing on minimising safety hazards which could be a danger to the well-being of their workers. While this is a must to reduce the threat to employees’ health and safety, management of the psychological hazards workers face needs to be developed further. Mental health problems in the workforce can have adverse consequences for companies, such as increased turnover. One simple but important step for employers is to recognise the impact stress, anxiety and depression can have on the physical and emotional health of their employees. Much more needs to be done to overhaul how companies respond to stress, as empathy and understanding is not necessarily a given. Equally, workers need to be able to seek help if they struggle. After all, if the company has a supportive, open and safe culture in place, they should be able to tell their employer if they suffer from stress, anxiety and depression.

Implication for investors

The implication for responsible investors is to continue or even begin to ask the management of investee companies questions about whether they consider mental health a risk to the business. Employee welfare is crucial to the success of most businesses and the employee suicides reported at companies such as Taiwan’s Hon Hai Precision Industry and France’s Orange highlight that corporate culture and resulting mental health strains can have implications for the business in terms of reputation and human capital. Hermes EOS will therefore continue to engage with companies to address the underlying issues.

Share this post:

Find posts by author

  • Bill Mackenzie
  • Bruce Duguid
  • Christine Chow
  • Colin Melvin – Global Head of Stewardship
  • Darren Brady
  • Dominic Burke
  • Emma Hunt
  • Freddie Woolfe
  • Hans-Christoph Hirt
  • Jaime Gornsztejn
  • Jennifer Walmsley
  • Jon Brager
  • Justine Lutterodt
  • Karin Ri
  • Leon Kamhi – Head of Responsibility at Hermes investment Management
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mais Hayek
  • Manuel Isaza
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Matthew Doyle
  • Maxine Wille
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Naheeda Rashid
  • Natacha Dimitrijevic
  • Nina Rehrbein
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Rochelle Giugni
  • Roland Bosch
  • Sachi Suzuki
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Tim Goodman
  • Victoria Barron

Find posts by category

  • Select category
  • social