We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

IASB seeks to clarify the "cashness"of the king

Home / Perspectives / IASB seeks to clarify the “cashness”of the king

14 May 2015

In analysing the credit risk of an issuer, analysts seek to uncover the economic realities of the company in focus. To that end, among the many items reviewed by analysts are the company’s financial statements, enabling them to assess its ability to meet its financial obligations. Seems pretty straightforward – and, to state the obvious, in assessing credit risk, analysts will focus on the cash flow statement because, after all, a company can’t service debt with widgets or earnings. In addition, as one of many measures of financial risk, credit analysts look at a company’s net leverage, defined as gross debt less cash divided by EBITDA. As straight forward as all of this seems, these methods are limited in their effectiveness because of the disclosures available to analysts. For instance, without getting into a philosophical discussion about what is meant by “cash” and “debt”, there are a few simple things that a company can do to make its disclosures more useful.

Improving disclosures about debt and cash is the principal rationale behind the proposed improvements by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to IAS 7: the accounting standard behind the cash flow statement. As an investor in global credit markets, we think the proposed changes make a lot of sense, can be implemented easily and are consistent with what is disclosed to shareholders.

The first component of the proposed amendment is to require companies to include a reconciliation of debt balances from the beginning of the accounting period until the end. This part of the amendment addresses a shortfall of the current cash flow statement, which results in the fairly common situation when “non-cash” changes to debt occur during an accounting period. (This may happen, for example, when a company enters into lease arrangements or in an M&A situation.) Given that shareholders have the benefit of a statement to the changes in shareholders’ equity, we believe it would be entirely consistent for companies to disclose similar information for the benefit of creditors related to changes in debt balances. While it is true that many companies provide this information voluntarily as part of their earnings presentations, a change to IAS 7 would create consistency across all users of International Financial Reporting Standards.

The second of the two changes to IAS 7 is to require information that will help identify how much of a company’s cash balance is restricted and therefore readily available to the company. This is important, if, for example, a sizeable portion of a company’s cash balances are “trapped” in a foreign jurisdiction due to punitive tax liabilities arising from repatriation of the cash, or restricted in some other way. For an analyst to capture this economic reality, they would have to deduct the restricted cash from the cash balance used in the net debt (and therefore net leverage) calculation. As it currently stands, these restricted cash balances are included in cash and cash equivalents. Consequently, we have no real idea how much of that cash could be used to service debt. Therefore, to distil the cash balance of a company operating on a global basis, an analyst needs to ask the company for details on any encumbered cash. And even if they do, details are not always provided. The requirement to provide these details, as per the proposed changes to IAS 7, can be easily adhered to and makes a lot of sense for the purpose of transparency and the calculation of credit metrics that more accurately reflect the economic realities of a company.

As a global investor, Hermes Credit is very much in favour of these proposed amendments and hopes that the IASB proceeds to a final amendment. As for next steps, the IASB is reviewing the comments letters received on the proposals ahead of discussions with the IASB, hopefully in June.

Share this post:

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Andrey Kuznetsov, CFA
  • Audra Stundziaite
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Elena Tedesco
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Gary Greenberg
  • Geir Lode
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Hamish Galpin
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ingrid Holmes
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Mitch Reznick, CFA
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Patrick Marshall
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tim Goodman
  • Tommaso Mancuso

Find posts by category

  • credit