We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Hermes calls for overhaul of CEO and executive remuneration models

Home / Press Centre / Hermes calls for overhaul of CEO and executive remuneration models

14 November 2016

Hermes Investment Management (Hermes), the £28.6 billion manager focused on delivering superior, sustainable, risk adjusted returns to its clients – responsibly, is calling on large publicly listed companies to overhaul current executive remuneration models.

In its paper ‘Remuneration Principles: clarifying expectations’, Hermes outlines why well-structured remuneration practices are key to aligning the activities of management with a company’s purpose, strategy and long-term performance. In the paper, Hermes also emphasises the need to address the question of fairness and give it a social licence to operate.

Hermes particularly examines the rapid expansion of CEO compensation over recent years. Analysis by the High Pay Centre suggests the ratio of CEO pay to the average worker has doubled in a little over a decade – from 70x in 2002 to 140x in 20151.

This phenomenon has clearly led to escalating public resentment, with a recent survey by PWC suggesting two thirds of the population believe executive pay is too high and 72% are “angry” as a result2. Politicians have noted the public’s ire, with new UK Prime Minister Theresa May recently outlining her intentions to clamp down on executive pay.

Hermes has long held the view that executives have to be aligned with the long-term fortunes of a company and therefore consider how it delivers returns to its multiple stakeholders: including customers, the employees and society in addition to shareholders. Moreover, Hermes has long engaged on this issue through its stewardship and engagement team, Hermes EOS. Hermes is therefore proposing a fundamental shift in the structure of executive remuneration packages towards much simpler, more transparent, more performance than share price driven and less-leveraged with greater accountability by the board and its remuneration committee.

The proposed reforms, as outlined in the attached paper, should help promote the long-term success of a publicly listed company for all stakeholders, while avoiding paying more than necessary. In addition, Hermes suggests further measures publicly listed companies should adopt – including the development of closer links between CEO/executive compensation and the pay of average worker. Hermes believes the chair of the board should write annually to employees to explain the basis for the CEO’s awarded pay for the current year – while the company should publish and comment upon the ratio of CEO to median worker pay – using both internal and external comparisons.

Saker Nusseibeh, Chief Executive, Hermes Investment Management, said: “We strongly believe the time is right for companies and investors to fundamentally rethink their approach to executive remuneration. Moreover, we are encouraged that many of the ideas we suggested in 2013 are re-emerging and are confident that there is now a significant appetite for change among many to consider how they may more closely align pay with the interests of their long-term owners, as well as broader society, in order to restore trust and position themselves best for future success. The investment management industry must recognise its responsibility to engage with companies effectively as interested owners and, where necessary, use shareholder rights collectively and consistently. We stand ready to work with companies to support efforts which we believe are in the interests of the company and their long-term shareholders.”

Hans-Christoph Hirt, Co- Head of Hermes EOS, Hermes Investment Management, said: “The combination of simplicity with increased certainty of outcome should result in lower average payouts, without changing the value of the award in the minds of individual executives. Importantly, we believe pay packages should avoid incentivising unintended behaviour and encourage the creation of sustainable value for all stakeholders. A shift away from heavy reliance on performance-related pay should assist with this.”

Read ‘Remuneration Principles: clarifying expectations’ online

  1. 1 Just Do It, High Pay Centre, 2015.
  2. 2 Opinium research for PWC, June 2016, as reported in PWC paper: Time to Listen, June 2016.
Share this post:

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso

Find posts by category

  • governance
  • stewardship

Press contacts