We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Budget reaction

Home / Press Centre / Budget reaction

Neil Williams, Senior Economic Adviser
08 July 2015
Macro Economics

Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist at Hermes Investment Management, reacts to today’s UK Budget: 

Post-election Budgets are rarely ‘give-aways’ and today’s was no exception – with the Chancellor looking to correct at a politically advantageous time (the start of the term) up to £17bn in spending-slippage relative to plans.

The onus as expected will fall on targeted welfare cuts, which together with the raising of personal tax thresholds and a national living wage, the Chancellor hopes to incentivise more people into work. In hard macro terms, time will tell how this trade-off plays out in sustaining what’s been an impressive UK growth-momentum. Given his aim was flagged in advance, it should not surprise financial markets.

Other than that, with the UK’s ‘sugar rush’ continuing and a smoother path of deficit reduction, equities and conventional gilts should welcome the preservation of his growth projections, forthcoming corporation tax and bank levy cuts, and yet tenure still of the fiscal reins.

But, the ‘only’ £3.5bn lower gilts supply now planned for 2015/16 (at £127.5bn) will disappoint some, given the coming proceeds from bank asset sales, and inevitable political temptation of tax cuts at the end of this Parliament.

So, let’s not get carried away. The fiscal screw will have to stay tight if the underlying budget deficit is to be whittled down and returned to the black in 2019/20 – one year later than expected in his March Budget. Recovery has helped, but better growth should have squeezed the deficit more than it has.

First, the deficit is still high. Even including special items like the transfer of the Royal Mail Pension Plan and QE profits, the near 5%-of-GDP headline deficit for 2014/15 was still the G7’s widest after Japan.

Second, while the headline deficit falls on better growth, the structural, less growth-sensitive part of the deficit will fall by less, begging further reform and consolidation.

And, only last year is the net-debt-to-GDP ratio expected to have peaked, at 81% – disappointing given real GDP is 5% up on its pre-crisis peak. This 81% ratio is more than twice Japan’s was, when Japan limped into a ‘lost decade’ in the mid 1990s.

Financing this debt may become more troublesome if the UK has later to deal with the effects of a ‘Brexit’, which in my opinion is a risk case only.

This means, for financial markets, a blend of fiscal consolidation – whether skewed toward spending cuts or tax hikes – and ways to protect recovery are still needed.

Meantime, the need to assess the growth impact of his measures, together with low CPI inflation and an unfixed euro-zone, should keep the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) ‘sitting on its hands’. The first BoE rate hike still looks off the cards until around the next scheduled Budget, in spring 2016.

Share this post:
Neil Williams Senior Economic Adviser Neil joined Hermes in August 2009 and is responsible for Hermes’ economic research. He has a forward-looking approach to generate investment strategy ideas. Neil adopts top-down methods – macro and market analysis to identify interest rate and credit value, and sovereign default risk. Neil began his career in 1987 at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), becoming its youngest ever Head of Economic Policy. He went on to hold a number of senior positions in investment banks - including Director of Bond Research at UBS, Head of Research at Sumitomo International, Global Head of Emerging Markets Research at PaineWebber International, and, before coming to Hermes, Head of Sovereign Research and Strategy at Mizuho International. Neil has 30 years’ industry experience and earned an MA in Economics in 1986 from Manchester University, having the previous year completed his BSc (Hons), also in Economics, from University College Swansea.
Read all articles by Neil Williams

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Ingrid Holmes
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso

Find posts by category

  • macro economics

Press contacts