We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Hermes: Fiscal slippage not halted by Brexit savings

Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist

Home / Press Centre / Hermes: Fiscal slippage not halted by Brexit savings

Neil Williams, Senior Economic Adviser
23 November 2016
Macro Economics

Neil Williams, Group Chief Economist at Hermes Investment Management, sets out his reaction to today’s UK Autumn Statement.

Today’s Statement was always going to signal the extent to which chancellor Hammond has kicked austerity into touch, though in the event not as much as some would like. The Treasury is no longer aiming to return the finances from red to black by 2019/20. Yet, with borrowing lifted again and Brexit looming, the chancellor is not going to let his fiscal-guard down completely: the squeeze is just deferred.

An underlying surplus is still targeted, but now not till about 2022/23. And, with lower-than-planned tax revenue since the spring Budget and softer GDP assumptions going forward, he’s inferring Brexit savings will not be enough to counter the £122bn extra borrowing over the next five years.

This fiscal slippage amounts to a meaty 5 percentage points of GDP compared with the Budget. And, while this is limited by funds still in his ‘back-pocket’ from bank proceeds and the BoE’s deferral of asset sales, the peak in the debt stock, at around 90% of GDP, is pushed back another two years.

As expected, there was help for the lower-income end and savers, and also follow-through commitments on infrastructure and corporation tax to help firms in the Brexit firing line. But, there were few ‘rabbits out of hats’. And, while helpful to longer-term growth and competiveness, his measures short-term may have more micro than macro effects on the economy.

So, let’s not get carried away. The fiscal screw will have to be tightened later if he’s to hit his new deadline.

First, the deficit is still high. Even including special items like bank sales, QE, and milder interest-rate assumptions, the 3.5%-of-GDP headline deficit for 2016/17 will still be the G7’s widest after Japan.

Second, the recovery should have squeezed the deficit more than it has. While the headline deficit falls, the structural, less growth-sensitive part will fall by less.

And, only in 2017/18 is the net-debt-to-GDP ratio expected to peak – disappointing given real GDP is about 8% up on its pre-crisis peak. This ratio, at about 90%, is more than twice Japan’s was, when Japan limped into a ‘lost decade’ in the mid 1990s.

Financing this debt may become more troublesome if we struggle with Brexit. Conventional gilts may benefit initially from the perceived hit to growth, but this could be short lived, given about one third of gilts outstanding is backed by international investors who will care about currency and ratings risk. This would disrupt the OBR’s low gilt yield assumptions.

In which case, the risk is the BoE extends its QE, with the unintended consequences of asset price distortions, suppressed saving, and increased funding strains on many pension schemes.

Share this post:
Neil Williams Senior Economic Adviser Neil joined Hermes in August 2009 and is responsible for Hermes’ economic research. He has a forward-looking approach to generate investment strategy ideas. Neil adopts top-down methods – macro and market analysis to identify interest rate and credit value, and sovereign default risk. Neil began his career in 1987 at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), becoming its youngest ever Head of Economic Policy. He went on to hold a number of senior positions in investment banks - including Director of Bond Research at UBS, Head of Research at Sumitomo International, Global Head of Emerging Markets Research at PaineWebber International, and, before coming to Hermes, Head of Sovereign Research and Strategy at Mizuho International. Neil has 30 years’ industry experience and earned an MA in Economics in 1986 from Manchester University, having the previous year completed his BSc (Hons), also in Economics, from University College Swansea.
Read all articles by Neil Williams

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso

Find posts by category

  • macro economics

Press contacts