We permit the publication of our auditors’ report, provided the report is published in full only and is accompanied by the full financial statements to which our auditors’ report relates, and is only published on an access-controlled page on your website, to enable users to verify that an auditors’ report by independent accountants has been commissioned by the directors and issued. Such permission to publish is given by us without accepting or assuming any responsibility or liability to any third party users save where we have agreed terms with them in writing.

Our consent is given on condition that before any third party accesses our auditors’ report via the webpage they first document their agreement to the following terms of access to our report via a click-through webpage with an 'I accept' button. The terms to be included on your website are as follows:

I accept and agree for and on behalf of myself and the Trust I represent (each a "recipient") that:

  1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) accepts no liability (including liability for negligence) to each recipient in relation to PwC’s report. The report is provided to each recipient for information purposes only. If a recipient relies on PwC’s report, it does so entirely at its own risk;
  2. No recipient will bring a claim against PwC which relates to the access to the report by a recipient;
  3. Neither PwC’s report, nor information obtained from it, may be made available to anyone else without PwC’s prior written consent, except where required by law or regulation; and
  4. PwC’s report was prepared with Hermes Property Unit Trust's interests in mind. It was not prepared with any recipient's interests in mind or for its use. PwC’s report is not a substitute for any enquiries that a recipient should make. The financial statements are as at 25 March 2017, and thus PwC’s auditors’ report is based on historical information. Any projection of such information or PwC’s opinion thereon to future periods is subject to the risk that changes may occur after the reports are issued and the description of controls may no longer accurately portray the system of internal control. For these reasons, such projection of information to future periods would be inappropriate.
  5. PwC will be entitled to the benefit of and to enforce these terms.
I accept

1. Select your country

  • United Kingdom
  • Austria
  • Australia
  • Belgium
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • USA
  • Other

2. Select your investor type

  • Financial Advisor
  • Discretionary Investment Manager
  • Wealth Manager
  • Family Office
  • Institutional Investor
  • Investment Consultant
  • Charity, Foundation & Endowment Investor
  • Retail Investor
  • Press
  • None of the above

3. Accept our terms and conditions

By clicking Proceed I confirm I have read the important information and agree to the terms of use.


The Hermes Investment Management website uses cookies to remember your preferences and help us improve the site.
By proceeding, you agree to cookies being placed on your computer.
Read our privacy and cookie policy.

Passive rise in Asia creating distortions for active managers to exploit

Home / Press Centre / Passive rise in Asia creating distortions for active managers to exploit

To the casual observer, the emerging Asia region has witnessed a powerful return to investor favour over the past three years1. However, beneath the surface of the broad market’s strong overall return of 33% over this period are some significant performance disparities – most notably across the capitalisation spectrum, according to Jonathan Pines, Asia Ex-Japan Portfolio Manager at Hermes Investment Management. The ten largest stocks in the region have seen an 88% share price spike2, far exceeding the 16% rise for mid-caps and 11% rise for small caps.

While the sharp rise of some mega-cap stocks, such as tech companies, is justified by fundamentals – the broader outperformance of this segment of stocks, and even more particularly the underperformance of the mid cap segment, has been powered in part by a substantial net flow of passive investment into the region. While active managers need to sell across the market cap spectrum to meet redemption requests, the passive manager finds that she only needs to buy the larger cap names to efficiently achieve an acceptable degree of index replication. This is particularly the case for those Asian stocks that also form part of broader global indices.

Although the impact of passive investment has challenged active investors in Asian equities recently, it also offers opportunities. While passive flows can influence markets in the short term, they cannot do so in the long term. Ultimately, price discovery relies on active managers who will eventually buy what is cheap and sell what is expensive. To quote value investing luminary Benjamin Graham, “in the short run, the market is a voting machine but in the long run it is a weighing machine”. The active to passive flows are certainly now strongly favouring the larger cap stocks that dominate the benchmark. In the end, the intrinsic value of the company behind each stock must determine its price.

The opportunity in unloved Korea
The Korean mid-cap space is an area of the market that has been a particular underperformer, rising a mere 6% over the past three years (compared to a 52% rise in Korean large caps), and is a segment of our benchmark that is now attractively priced. The South Korean economy is remarkably robust, growing at its fastest quarterly rate in seven years in the third quarter of 2017, despite the obvious headwind of the increasing tensions on its border. While the threat of North Korea and its nuclear armament is real, there is enough understanding of the potential nuclear devastation on both sides to prevent further military escalation – barring an accident. We are finding a number of opportunities in the Korean mid cap space, particularly among ‘value’ and cyclical companies.

One such example is South Korea’s second-biggest steelmaker by sales. Steel company investors have been focused on the dynamics of the iron ore industry based on the presumption that there is strong correlation between iron ore prices and steel company margins. The Seoul-based steel company’s stock price has also been hurt by particular concerns about production, profitability, its parent company and weakness in the iron ore market. Nevertheless, the steelmaker’s profits have remained remarkably consistent over much of the past decade. Yet the stock is trading near a record low multiple relative to book value. Cuts in Chinese steel production in response to the country’s pollution concerns might also help the steelmaker’s profitability.

We are also finding opportunities in the supply chain of its parent company. Sentiment across the automotive industry has been negative on concerns surrounding Korea’s relationship with China, driverless cars, private hire services and electric vehicles. While some of these concerns are real in terms of their impact on the group’s prospects, we believe that the company’s business model will evolve and if we are right, it implies that many companies within the the group’s supply chain are far too cheap.

Lastly, we are finding that there are opportunities in companies fuelling these competitive emerging technologies. For example, we have recently added electric vehicle (EV) battery manufacturers. In both cases, when we initiated positions we considered the market to be underestimating the value of the EV segment of the companies. Indeed, we were surprised that despite the growing hype around Electric, the fast growing EV battery businesses seemed in both cases to be ascribed very little value at all. It is clear that there is going to be very substantial revenue growth of EV battery manufacturers and the market is getting excited. It is admittedly less clear if this growth will be sufficiently profitable to generate a good return on investment. In the context of increasing interest in the EV names, we will continue to size our positions in the space based on an evolving consideration of the likelihood and extent of the companies’ ability to turn the strong growth in revenue into profits.

  1. 1 To 7 November 2017, in US dollars.
  2. 2 Weighted by market capitalization of the top 10 names, with the rise mainly attributable to the strong performance of technology companies.
Share this post:
Jonathan Pines, CFA Jonathan Pines joined Hermes in March 2009 as Portfolio Manager responsible for Asia ex Japan within the Emerging Markets strategy; Hermes launched the Asia ex Japan strategy at the start of 2010 appointing Jonathan as lead Portfolio Manager. Prior to joining Hermes he was a fund manager at RAB Capital and an analyst at Orbis Investment Advisory in London. Jonathan grew up in South Africa, where he was a partner at PKF Johannesburg, Chief Investment Officer of Akul Capital (South Africa), and non-executive director of several listed and private South African companies. He holds an MBA from Harvard Business School, is a CFA charterholder and is a chartered accountant. Jonathan won Asian Investor's Asset Management Award for best Asia ex Japan equity strategy in 2014, 2015, and 2016, Citywire Asia's Asia ex Japan Group Award in 2016, and Investment Week’s 2016 Fund Manager of the Year Award for Asian equity. Further information about Hermes Asia ex Japan.
Read all articles by Jonathan Pines, CFA

Find posts by author

  • Alex Knox, ACA
  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Parry
  • Claire Gavini
  • Dr Michael Viehs
  • Emeric Chenebaux
  • Eoin Murray
  • Geoffrey Wan, CFA
  • Harriet Steel
  • Jonathan Pines, CFA
  • Louise Dudley
  • Mark Sherlock, CFA
  • Martin Todd
  • Michael Russell, CFA
  • Michael Vaughan
  • Neil Williams
  • Nick Spooner
  • Nina Röhrbein
  • Philip Nell
  • Saker Nusseibeh
  • Silvia Dall’Angelo
  • Tatiana Bosteels
  • Tim Crockford
  • Tommaso Mancuso

Find posts by category

  • emerging markets

Press contacts