Search this website. You can use fund codes to locate specific funds

EOS 2020 Annual Review

EOS publishes 2020 Annual Review with full engagement and voting highlights

Fast reading

  • Key lessons from the pandemic for companies and investors
  • Update on Climate Action 100+ and the companies where we lead or co-lead engagement
  • Q&As with engagers on biodiversity and AI ethics
  • Case studies on AMN Healthcare and Baidu

Although pandemic risk was identified by many companies as a low-likelihood, high-impact event, Covid-19 demonstrated that businesses were not prepared for the scale of government interventions, including national lockdowns that devastated economies.

EOS’s 2020 Annual Review of its engagement activities and voting recommendations identifies some of the key lessons that companies must learn from the pandemic, and ways to improve sustainability-focused risk management over the longer term.

For example, the pandemic has demonstrated the importance to companies of strong health and safety practices and provisions - such as sick pay and mental health support - to ensure business continuity. It has also shown why all businesses need to maintain a social licence to operate, underpinned by a corporate purpose. Companies that laid off workers after receiving government support were closely scrutinised by investors and the public. We take a look at this changing landscape.

Although Covid-19 captured the headlines in 2020, the long-term issues posed by the climate crisis have not gone away. The rapidity with which some governments moved to contain the pandemic - with a significant impact on business operating models and daily life - offered companies and society a window through which to view possible responses to the looming climate crisis.

The EOS 2020 Annual Review includes a progress report on our participation in the collaborative initiative Climate Action 100+, where we lead or co-lead engagement with over 30 companies. We assess the net-zero commitments made by oil and gas companies as well as the decarbonisation challenges for energy demand-side participants, as policy grinds ever tighter. In the run up to COP26, to be held in the UK in November 2021, we can expect to see further shifts as the pressure builds to bring national policies into line with Paris Agreement pledges.

To find out more, read the EOS 2020 Annual Review. 

Related Insights

Votes for change
This year we saw a number of companies offering shareholders a vote on their climate transition plans, including some in the oil and gas, construction, aviation, and consumer goods sectors.
Salary or sick leave – the impossible choice
In the United States, the lack of national paid family and medical leave policies underpins many difficult, often impossible, choices faced by disproportionately impacted worker populations.
Siemens Energy case study
Siemens Energy is addressing the challenges of the climate transition by setting science-based emissions reduction targets.
A watershed for climate change stewardship?
Mainstream sentiment has shifted, and the momentum is with investors calling for faster action on climate change.
Abate and switch: steel seeks low carbon solutions
Steel is considered a hard-to-abate sector, but national net-zero commitments and pressure from customers mean that solutions must be found to help drive down emissions.
Nature’s larder – why food producers must safeguard biodiversity
As many of the risks associated with the decline of nature are concentrated in the agricultural supply chain, it is imperative that companies develop a comprehensive understanding of how biodiversity underpins their business model.

EOS Client Service and Business Development

Amy D’Eugenio,
Head of Client Service and Business Development, EOS