The CIO’s view
Robert Ostrowski
What’s your outlook for 2026?
Fixed income markets enter the new year with a surplus of unanswered questions. To be fair, 2025 answered some. A year ago, we expected a repeat of the post-2016 election environment, with a combination of a doveish-leaning Federal Reserve (Fed) in the short-term and uncertainty about the long-term success of the new administration’s policies resulting in further steepening of the US yield curve. This took longer to evolve than expected.
Defying market expectations and growing political pressure, the Fed paused for nine months before eventually resuming interest rate cuts a year into the cycle. Gradually, tariffs-driven uncertainty and resultant volatility gave way to investor consensus that the Fed’s dual mandate will be manageable going forward, rate cuts will continue toward a lower fed funds rate and a more dovish Fed and Chair will be in place in 2026.
We wish it were that simple, but expect it won’t be – too many unanswered questions remain. Inflation has not spiked as soon and dramatically as expected from tariffs, but neither has it made convincing progress toward the Fed’s target of 2%, remaining elevated and susceptible to tariff impacts (pending Supreme Court action). Employment is softening, but due to significant increases in investment, GDP is solid and the economy is not exhibiting anything near what would normally require the extent of rate cuts currently being ‘demanded’ by the administration. A current contrary view gaining momentum is that the Fed doesn’t need to cut at all, as the economy, at a macro level, doesn’t need stimulation, and risks of elevated inflation remain. The extended bear steepener (short rates falling more than long rates) is evidence of this conflicted point of view in the markets.
Adding to the mix is a more uncertain US political environment. The recent off-cycle election, dominated by the Democrats in the few key races that gathered the nation’s attention, suggests that the 2026 mid-terms might disrupt the administration’s current policy path currently discounted in the market. Mid-term US election years have been systematically less positive for risk assets, creating another risk to consider for already tight credit spreads. Our expectation is that the market may fade US exceptionalism and look to a reglobalisation theme, but in an ex-US fashion i.e., looking to emerging market bonds and currencies.
The challenge in 2026 will be avoiding the complacency of believing a new normal exists in which policy disruptions including tariffs and irrational artificial intelligence (AI) exuberance are easily absorbed. Though US recession risks appear at bay, the slow-growth economy can easily change direction. Increased unemployment, and spiking inflation, aka stagflation, remain in play over the next year. Credit events and layoffs are also making the news, while critical economic data reporting has been limited. Managing yield curve and duration exposure, as well as finding value across a range of assets that are priced for perfection will continue to be required priorities.
Mitch Reznick, CFA
What’s your one contrarian view going into 2026?
The current state of sustainable finance resembles a Rorschach test. Depending on whom you speak to, it’s either moribund or thriving. We have our own interpretation of the ink blotter that is the state of sustainable finance.
Beyond the dramatic headlines that predict the slow death of the asset class, there are several factors that portray an evolving, indelible part of capital markets. Starting with the labelled bond market, the figures suggest primary issuance in sustainable bond markets for 2025 is on track to be US$1.2tn, representing a small increase versus 2024. What makes this figure so remarkable is that the number of corporate, labelled bonds out of the US has fallen nearly 40%1. However, there has been an impressive surge in securitised, social-labelled bonds out of the US over the last few years that continued well into 2025.
The state of Texas happens to be one of – if not the – leading US state investing in and adopting renewable energy. In 2024, renewable sources in Texas generated over 166 GWh of energy, ahead even of California2. This trend could well continue after a number of anti-renewable energy bills failed to pass into law this year. California, along with Texas and a handful of southern states, remains at the top of the league tables when it comes to investing in renewable energy3.
From a regulatory perspective, the US is rolling back requirements for sustainability disclosures while Europe appears to be losing momentum on this front. Meanwhile, the rest of the world is pushing ahead. In Asia, India, the UK, and Australia, the focus is on the inclusion of ‘transition’ activities in disclosures and taxonomies. This inclusion is highly sensible. If the global economy is going to pivot in a way that generates economic value in a sustainable fashion, a successful transition is imperative.
What will be the biggest catalyst for new issuance in 2026?
Expected sources of power generation – which require new capital – are a good indication of where we’re headed in sustainable finance. The International Energy Agency (IEA) forecasts rapid, sharp increases in renewables, which should, as the IEA sees it, partially displace coal4. There are some indications that we’re at a positive tipping point of sorts regarding the adoption of renewable energy, since installed renewable energy exceeded that of coal for the first time in 20255. This transition from coal to renewables is being driven by a rapid adaption of solar and wind. In 2024, according to Bloomberg, over 70% of new, installed global energy capacity was solar. Coal and fossil fuel-sourced energy will likely continue to grow but is expected to do so at a slower pace than renewable energy.
There’s a structural change underway in development finance too. It will become increasingly difficult for the world’s multilateral development institutions (MDIs) to maintain current levels of development finance activities when it comes to clean water, renewable energy and positive social outcomes. The shareholders of such banks are pulling financial support for political or fiscal reasons. Boston Consulting Group suggests this withdrawal of MDI development finance in emerging markets could amount to as much as US$70bn. One of the key messages of the COP 30 climate conference is a need to scale up and mobilise capital markets, given these structural changes. Alternative credit solutions can be made to meet the needs of development finance and deliver solid returns.
The forces driving sustainable finance are shifting. A financial market that has grown rapidly is finding its comfort zone as it accelerates into a new stage of growth. It may not look like the past, but sustainable finance will be present in the future
1 Bloomberg: BNEF
4 https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/world-electricity-generation-in-the-stated-policies-scenario-2010-2035, Licence: CC BY 4.0
5 Bloomberg: BNEF
Nachu Chockalingam, CFA
Mohammed Elmi, CFA
Have tariffs reshaped global investment flows or shifted them temporarily?
Tariffs will no doubt have a long-term effect on global capital and trade flows in emerging markets (EMs). Before China’s accession to the World Trade Organisation in 2001, EMs were solely viewed as a source of raw materials. However, since then they’ve moved up the global value chain. As they’ve liberalised their economies, foreign direct investment (FDI) flows have accelerated. South Africa, for instance, now has a high-value motor manufacturing capability; and Turkey’s defence industry has rapidly expanded to the point of becoming a major global arms exporter. Therefore, although tariff uncertainty and the rolling back of globalisation could impede developed market investment into EMs, we still expect to see growth in inter-EM trade and capital flows which should offset any decline.
Will deglobalisation continue, or are we seeing a re-globalisation?
We don’t believe in the end-of-globalisation narrative, but we do see a re-orientation away from developed to emerging markets. We’re still in the early stages of the ’South to South’1 trade and expect investment flows, trade linkages and policy co-ordination to increase. Asia is already ahead of the curve in this respect, with inter-regional trade now on a par with the region’s trade with Europe. Increased lending in renminbi will help facilitate these linkages – as will talk of a new payment system and potentially a BRICs-wide currency to circumvent the US and the US dollar.
Is the era of low interest rates truly over?
In a word, yes. In the post-Covid world, where resilience and re-shoring are dominant factors, the overall neutral rate is higher. If inflation remains stable, fixed income investors stand to benefit from higher all-in yields and emerging market debt offers some of the highest yields in the fixed income universe.
Are central banks still the most powerful market force?
Yes. US central bank activity can still continue to affect EMs – but their influence should wane in lieu of more idiosyncratic factors such as the region’s external and fiscal positions, namely debt and government balance sheets. On that basis, EM countries screen well versus their developed market peers, with low debt loads, higher growth and a benign current account picture.
Further themes that will matter next year:







