Search this website. You can use fund codes to locate specific funds

Green bond-financed projects are necessary but not sufficient

In its September Quarterly Review, the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) published a much-needed article that analysed the impact of fighting the climate crisis at the firm-level from corporate projects funded by green bonds[i]. In their own words the authors conclude, “…green bond projects have not necessarily translated into comparatively low or falling carbon emission at the firm level.”  As a complement to the existing suite of labels for green bonds, the authors suggest that a firm-level, green rating system predicated on carbon emission intensity would incentivise companies to decarbonise in alignment with the Paris climate goals.  Considering the rapid expansion of the green bond market, its conclusions are, to put it mildly, controversial. 

Decarbonisation of the economy is security-agnostic
While we are not convinced about some aspects of the paper, we are in unequivocal agreement that climate assessments at the security level are insufficient to assess companies’ decarbonisation pathways at the firm level. Moreover, as we have said in the past, we most certainly agree with the tone of the paper: green bond-financed projects are necessary to solve the climate crisis, but not sufficient. While we encourage further development of the green bond market, the decarbonisation of the economy cannot happen unless companies find ways to continue to create economic value whilst simultaneously decarbonising in alignment with the goals of Paris. As such, we believe the authors are correct to shift the focus of the corporate world’s contribution in the fight in the climate crisis to corporate activities in general and away from projects specifically.

Scoring a firm’s carbon-intensity: An possible input, but not a panacea
The firm-level, green-rating system that the authors propose—the distribution of companies in deciles predicated on carbon intensity--has certain attractive elements to it as well as some challenges.

If employed, this rating should only serve as one contribution to the investment process and not be relied upon in its entirety as an ESG assessment. The creation of the score is based on slow-moving, historical data. Yet we want to invest in a company’s future, not in its past. As such, its ex-post character must be placed in the context of a more complete ex-ante assessment. For example, a company now managing the physical and transition risks of climate change through M&A, capital expenditures or technological advances could score poorly given its green credentials would be based on historic data. However, assuming we can find value in their debt securities, it is in these such companies we would choose to invest and with whom we would want to engage.

While we agree with the authors on the benefits a standardised scoring system would bring, calculating emissions intensity for comparative purposes can be more easily done now than in the past. We have seen rapid improvements in environmental disclosures and growth in data providers (e.g, Trucost). In addition, Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) scores offer a comparable level of insight to the scores that the authors seek.

We are very encouraged by the principal message of this paper: We must find incentives to accelerate the decarbonisation of economic activities if we are to reach the goals of Paris. In so doing, we must focus on changing behaviour at the firm level as well as the green-project level.

 

Latest Articles

Federated Hermes managed assets see success in the GRESB 2020 results
A number of portfolios and assets managed by the international business of Federated Hermes have achieved success in in this year’s GRESB Real Estate Assessment results.
Federated Hermes Infrastructure appoints James Wardlaw as Partner
Federated Hermes is announcing the appointment of James Wardlaw as a Partner in its Infrastructure business.
Looking into 2021 with Federated Hermes
Senior management, the investment floor, EOS and our responsibility office share their outlooks for next year.
Without a ‘Blue Wave’, will US energy companies steer towards a green future?
In the run-up to the US election, many investors had positioned themselves for a ‘Blue Wave’. Yet, as it became clear that Biden’s Presidency would not be accompanied by a majority Democratic senate, oil and gas stocks rallied and renewable energy producer stocks fell. The absence of a senate majority has cast doubt on the now President-Elect’s ability to push through a climate-focused plan that would see an overhaul of federal energy policy and pledge to rejoin the Paris accord.
Federated Hermes' latest on the US Elections
Managers across our investment floor in London and Pittsburgh comment on the US Election
Federated Hermes comments ahead of US Election
Federated Hermes comments ahead of US Election

Press Contacts

Johnny Weir,
Head of Corporate Communications
Rachael Dowers,
Manager - Corporate Communications
Hannah Bellfield,
Assistant Manager - Corporate Communications
Harriet Hall,
Associate - Corporate Communications