The CIO’s view
Deborah Cunningham, CFA
What’s your one contrarian view going into 2026?
That the US Federal Reserve (the Fed) will remain independent. The Trump administration’s relentless criticism of Fed Chair Jerome Powell has led many to think the president will erode the long-held insulation the central bank has from politics. Recent actions, such as attempts to fire one governor and the appointment of a White House economist to the board, have intensified that worry in financial markets. We’re also concerned – but believe that, ultimately, the Fed will prevail, especially given this summer’s Supreme Court ruling that it’s a “uniquely structured, quasi-private entity”.
Although the administration will likely nominate more dovish voting members to join the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) – these could include regional Fed presidents, the Board of Governors and, of course, Powell’s successor – we expect the debate about the calibre of the candidates to centre on their market knowledge and credentials. The names floated to succeed Powell seem to fit its desire to influence the Fed, but I’m hopeful the Senate confirmation process will focus on their expertise in monetary policy and that this will maintain the integrity of the institution.
Is the era of low interest rates truly over?
The administration’s dovish stance has raised concerns that we might return to the long period of near-zero interest rates. We don’t think this will be the case. We expect short-term interest rates to remain in a range of 3-5% based on the strength of the US economy, which should keep inflation above 2%. This is the Fed’s stance, as its latest Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) forecasts the long run level of the Personal Consumption Expenditures Index to be 2%. In other words, the Fed’s intention, at the moment, is to continue to define price stability at that level. The other clue, of course, is its long-run fed funds projection, which is currently at 3%. Changes in Fed leadership and the composition of the FOMC likely will not lead to rates around zero anytime soon.
While it’s too early to be confident about the Fed’s path of policy in 2026 – witness the wide range in predictions in the September SEP – we anticipate some amount of easing to continue. But we believe money market funds will remain attractive to investors. Most money fund portfolios hold securities of different maturities bought with the higher rates available before a given Fed cut. This in turn typically causes yields of these portfolios to decline slower than those found in the direct market.
John Sidawi
Is the era of low interest rates truly over?
The pandemic bonded different global economic cycles into one gigantic monetary mandate. Almost every central bank on the planet simultaneously flooded markets with liquidity by aggressively cutting borrowing costs and implementing various degrees of quantitative easing. Thankfully, this unified front succeeded in alleviating one of the biggest global economic threats in over a century. Unfortunately, this success also produced a toxic byproduct that afflicted economies on a global scale: hyper-inflation. This development prompted central banks to reverse course and begin to raise benchmarks interest rates in unison. Country diversification, the hallmark of global fixed income investing, became a scarce phenomenon as global monetary correlations converged to one.
Today, the story is quite different. The European Central Bank’s (ECB) monetary framework is in ‘a good place’, according to President Christine Lagarde1. In their latest meeting, the ECB elected to keep rates on hold at 2% and their forward guidance was relatively uneventful. In the monetary world, ’uneventful‘ is probably one of the biggest accolades that a central banker can receive. The current baseline for the ECB is to remain on hold in the near future, but with a slight bias for modest easing in the second half of 2026. Conversely, the prospects for interest rate hikes have begun to percolate among economic viewpoints. We feel that this risk is premature given the disinflationary trends in Europe and the ongoing external geopolitical uncertainties. Overall, “a good place” should keep European yields, particularly German bunds, range-bound in the months ahead.
Faced with meagre growth but obstinate inflation, benchmark rates in the UK remain in restrictive territory and have placed the Bank of England (BoE) in a most unenviable place. However, a recent stall in consumer price increases, along with moderating labour dynamics, have made the BoE’s policy objective a little less ugly. The BoE has long imparted that it required ample signaling from inflation to embark on a systematic easing path. This recent pause in costs has the potential to develop into a major inflection point for UK monetary policy. However, the present 3.8% CPI rate is still historically elevated and has been running over 3% for six consecutive months now. Nonetheless, economic datasets have finally begun to align themselves for further monetary easing.
So, where does this leave US monetary policy? Unfortunately, the most recent economic data vacuum in the US, has left the Federal Reserve without a place to call their own. The tug-of-war nature of disinflation is an overly delicate challenge to begin with, and the void of economic data in the US has made the Fed’s mandate that much more complex. What is clear however in the US is that further rate cuts are required, but what is not so evident is how many? Will Fed policy in 2026 be driven by inflation or the labour market? As the data deficit abyss nears its end, the Fed too will soon find its place. Good, bad, or ugly.
Overall, this emerging variance among the world’s leading central bank authorities is a welcomed evolution for investors seeking to diversify their fixed income holdings on a global scale.
Further themes that will matter next year:






